• sns06
  • sns01
  • sns02
  • sns03
  • sns04
  • sns05
list_banner1

Capable News

Fidget Toy Infringement Case Resurfaces, Chinese Manufacturers Become Plainti

As Time Goes By, Finger Toys Come in More Varieties. From Finger Spinners and Stress Relief Bubble Boards in the past to the Now Popular Ball-Shaped Finger Toys. Not long ago, the Design Patent for this Ball-Shaped Finger Toy was Granted in January this year. Presently, Sellers are Being Sued for Patent Infringement.

Case Information

Case Number: 23-cv-01992

Filing Date: March 29, 2023

Plaintiff: SHENZHEN***PRODUCT CO., LTD

Represented by: Stratum Law LLC

Brand Introduction

The Plaintiff is a Chinese product manufacturer known for inventing the silicone squeeze ball, also known as the finger stress relief toy. Highly popular among customers on Amazon, the toy enjoys a good reputation and high-quality reviews. When pressing the protruding half-sphere bubbles on the toy’s surface, they burst with a satisfying pop sound, providing anxiety and stress relief.

e3818e3b1ff046ffa6605b9adf028f64

Brand Intellectual Property

The manufacturer filed a US design patent on September 16, 2021, which was granted on January 17, 2023.

66c4217660df482ca185efa6c9d27c47

The patent protects the appearance of the product, which features a large circle with multiple half-spheres attached. This means that the appearance shape is protected by the patent regardless of the color used, unless significant changes are made to the overall circular or half-sphere shape.

Infringement Display Style

f09cedb35ec6463796f8dd598fe53346

Using the keywords “POP IT STRESS BALL” provided in the complaint, around 1000 related products were retrieved from Amazon.

3e3d64eb2f0d45969901612f5f7fdc3a

Stress relief toys have consistently held a strong presence on Amazon, particularly the FOXMIND Rat-A-Tat Cat product of 2021, which saw huge success in sales across major European and American platforms. FOXMIND successfully sued thousands of cross-border e-commerce businesses, resulting in substantial compensation. Therefore, to sell a patented product, authorization or product modification is necessary to avoid infringement risks.

For the circular shape in this case, one could consider modifying it to an oval, square, or even an animal shape such as a walking, flying, or swimming animal.

As a seller facing a lawsuit, if you are selling a product similar to the plaintiff’s design patent, ceasing the sale of the infringing product should be your first step as continued sales may lead to further financial losses. Additionally, consider the following options:

  1. Verify the validity of the plaintiff’s design patent. If you believe the patent is invalid or flawed, consult with an attorney to seek assistance and raise objections.

  2. Seek a settlement with the plaintiff. You can negotiate a settlement agreement with the plaintiff to avoid protracted legal disputes and economic losses.

The first option may require substantial financial and time investments, making it less suitable for companies with limited liquid funds. The second option of settlement can lead to a quicker resolution and reduced losses.


Post time: Aug-15-2023

Send your message to us:

Write your message here and send it to us.